Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Bylewski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Bylewski[edit]

Scott Bylewski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear WP:NPOL fail and all non-local coverage appears to have come from a single event in 2009. Was created by an SPA. GPL93 (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable local politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, known locally, Fails Wp:GNG , Alex-h (talk) 13:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Smalltown municipal councillor, not referenced even close to well enough to get him over WP:NPOL #2 as appreciably more notable than most other smalltown municipal councillors. The references which are reliable sources just briefly glance off his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article about something or somebody else, which is not how you make a municipal councillor notable, and the references which are about him are primary sources, which are not support for notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 04:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.